Building a new computer requires 10 years worth of power

Tue May 27, 2008 4:36PM EDT

See Comments (31)

I slobber over new computers as much as anyone... but I've never really stopped to think about the environmental and energy impact that actually building that computer entails as an alternative to using my old computer for longer.

According to Ecogeek, the true cost of a new computer in energy terms is astounding: It takes as much energy to building one computer as it does to run one for 10 full years. That's a phenomenal figure, one which should give any would-be computer buyer pause.

One thing not mentioned, however, is that newer computers tend to use less power than older ones, so there are potential cost and energy savings to be found by upgrading (though perhaps not 10 years worth of savings). And while reinstalling your OS, adding RAM, and generally cleaning out your system can definitely reinvigorate an older computer, these tricks won't work 100 percent of the time. I'd be wiping the hard drive and reinstalling Windows on my current laptop right now if it wasn't about to literally fall apart due to a broken LCD bezel that prevents it from closing and a growing crack in the base that threatens to dump the computer's contents into my lap one of these days.

That said, with the 220 million tons of e-waste generated annually in the country (also per the story linked below), maybe a little duct tape and super glue would have been the more environmentally conscious choice.

LINK: EcoGeek 

Comments on Building a new computer requires 10 years worth of power

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by alexgannis on Tue May 27, 2008 7:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    That right now and these days computers after two years are out dated since computer are being more advance and running faster and that why people are having problems with window vista trying to install an upgrade OS onto a 10 year old computer doesn't make sense sooner people well have to upgrade to a new computer or they will just have more problem, even with their window xp because it too well no longer be supported.

  • 2 Posted by krumpy_14 on Tue May 27, 2008 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    It takes me a lot of enegy to get out of bed every day, but I'm going to keep doing it, since the alternative is worse.

  • 3 Posted by agustin2489 on Tue May 27, 2008 8:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow, that really does give me something to digest. I'm going to be building a desktop soon so I wonder, how many carbon credits would I be able to save thanks to my building it?

  • 4 Posted by cricketr77 on Tue May 27, 2008 8:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Do you mean run the computer continuously (:-o)... Or just 10 years of normal usage?

  • 5 Posted by rorbincalendar on Tue May 27, 2008 10:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    krumpy_14 excellent. Secondly the cost of that energy is built into the price I pay for the new computer. I thought I would never see the day that a tech consultant recommends potentially using outdated or obsolete tech for a nonexistent problem. Bizarre.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.